Massive spikes in heart failure, strokes, blood clots, cancers, and vaccine-acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (VAIDS) – all of which are side effects of the mRNA injection – have caused global excess death numbers to soar
As sudden deaths continue to soar around the world, pharmaceutical companies have been quietly dropping mRNA vaccines, which have been repeatedly linked to the phenomenon.
Since the public rollout of Covid mRNA shots in early 2021, sudden and unexpected deaths have been skyrocketing.
Massive spikes in heart failure, strokes, blood clots, cancers, and vaccine-acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (VAIDS) – all of which are side effects of the mRNA injection – have caused global excess death numbers to soar.
The idea of mRNA vaccines goes back to Robert Malone’s discoveries in the late 1980s.
Malone was unable to pursue them and the patents passed to pharmaceutical giant Merck.
Merck spent the end of the old century expensively failing to develop a product.
The idea might have remained in abeyance had it not been for 9/11 and the curious episode, immediately afterward, when letters laced with anthrax spores were posted to Senators and media outlets.
The letters, allegedly sent by a disaffected U.S. Army scientist, killed five people and infected 17 more.
At the time, the world was already shaken by planes being used as missiles and became anxious about the threat of bioterrorism.
In 2018 a pharmaceutical company – seeking new smallpox vaccines – re-created the extinct horsepox virus using DNA chemistry alone.
Given the right conditions, the reborn virus-infected tissue culture replicates itself.
The potential to recreate smallpox became all too apparent.
It is widely believed, if not officially, that the COVID-19 pandemic began with the escape of a virus manipulated by collaborating U.S. and Chinese scientists.
More at:
Myocarditis Occurring After Immunization With mRNA-Based COVID-19 Vaccines
Two reports in the current issue of JAMA Cardiology describe cases of acute myocarditis that occurred among persons who received the BNT162b2-mRNA (Pfizer-BioNTech) or mRNA-1273 (Moderna) messenger RNA (mRNA)–based COVID-19 vaccines authorized for use in the US.1,2 During the clinical evaluations of these patients, alternative etiologies for myocarditis were not detected.
The first report describes 4 cases of myocarditis with symptom onset 1 to 5 days after receipt of a second dose of mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine (2 receiving the BNT162b2-mRNA vaccine and 2 receiving the mRNA-1273 vaccine) who were evaluated in a single tertiary care medical center (Duke University Medical Center) that attempted to define its catchment population.1 Three cases occurred in men aged 23 to 36 years and the fourth in a 70-year-old woman; details about the medical history of the fourth patient were not provided, but she received coronary angiography during her evaluation and no atherosclerosis was found. All presented with severe acute chest pain, had abnormal electrocardiogram results, and had evidence of myocardial injury demonstrated by elevated troponin levels. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was performed in these 4 patients on days 3 through 5 after vaccine receipt, and the findings were consistent with acute myocarditis as defined by recent expert consensus guidelines.3
The second, larger case report comes from the US Military Health System and describes 23 individuals with acute myocarditis who presented within 4 days after mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccination.2 All patients were male, 22 of 23 were on active duty, and the median (range) age was 25 (20-51) years; 20 cases occurred after receipt of a second dose of an mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine. Clinical presentations and laboratory findings were similar to those described in the smaller case series1; 8 of 23 patients in this series received cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and all 8 demonstrated findings again consistent with acute myocarditis.2
More at:
A Flawed Medical Procedure x Billions of Times = A Medical Armageddon
What is the Bolus Theory? The Bolus Theory is the outcome of a detailed root-cause analysis I undertook. The theory explains all the adverse events by the fact that a significant dose of vaccine is directly injected intravascularly, bypassing many protections set in place by Evolution and triggering cardio-vascular and capillary damage throughout the body, as well as cancers and genetic disorders.
Letter to my friend Steve Kirsch, Bret Weinstein, and Tucker Carlson
Dear Steve, Bret, and Tucker,
Thank you all three for your constant quest for the truth, the high quality of your discussions, and the clarity of your recent statements.
Tucker, you probably don’t know me, but Steve and Bret have known me or of me for some time now. On your show, Bret briefly mentioned a theory of vaccine harm I developed, the Bolus Theory. Steve and I are friends, and we have been interacting regularly, notably, when I was on a scientific team, he set up in 2021.
Given my work was mentioned in your discussion and that I have dedicated the past 3 years of my life to unraveling the mystery of COVID vaccine injuries, I thought I’d chip in, build on what was already presented and unveil the elephant in the room,.
What is the Bolus Theory? The Bolus Theory is the outcome of a detailed root-cause analysis I undertook. The theory explains all the adverse events by the fact that a significant dose of vaccine is directly injected intravascularly, bypassing many protections set in place by Evolution and triggering cardio-vascular and capillary damage throughout the body, as well as cancers and genetic disorders.
What’s a bolus? Why is a bolus dangerous? A bolus is a concentrated dose of particles directly injected or infused into the bloodstream, typically to deliver a drug or a product in a concentrated fashion to an organ.
It’s dangerous because (A) the IV injection avoids the disseminative effect of the vascular system with a 270,000x magnifying-glass effect, which causes considerable concentrated damage to blood vessels’ walls given the vaccines trigger T-cell attacks, and (B) because a bolus can reach deeper and contaminate hidden away high-replication stem cells, triggering a variety of dominos explained below, notably cancer.
Why am I saying more harm has occurred? When Bret cautiously and eloquently mentioned the 17 million deaths, a conservative estimate found by Dr Denis Rancourt and his team, most were in disbelief. Unfortunately, the COVID vaccination campaign has likely harmed many more worldwide, likely 40 times more. Not everybody dies; thankfully, not all organs hit are life-threatening, and severities can vary. But these people are harmed nonetheless, often for life and with degenerative disease in some cases.
My estimate points to 1 in 20 injections going IV accidentally. By that account, 670 million people worldwide would have been harmed, to a degree or another. And studies of accidental IV injections suggest that 127 million people have been harmed clinically.
So far, according to VAERS , the elderly1 represent 75% of the deceased, or 13 million elderly deceased. Given that damage is not age-related, extrapolation from the proportion of elderly tells us that, indeed, 100 to 130 million people have likely suffered from life-threatening damage. A youngster can survive a hit to the heart longer than an eighty-year-old who will die more rapidly, for example.
Naturally, bolus damage happens in many other less sensitive organs. The focus of many has been on myocarditis and heart failure. But, the list of illnesses and disabilities is much longer: autism, auto-immune diseases, bowel inflammatory diseases, cancer, endocrine disorders, infertility, genetic disorders, neurodegenerative diseases, obesity, reproductive disorders, organ failures, skin and muscle disorders, tinnitus…
The long list of celebrities hit with vaccine-associated illnesses or sudden deaths these past three years testifies to how pervasive harm has been: Ashton Kutcher, Bruce Willis, Carlos Santana, Celine Dion, Eric Clapton, Fleetwood Mac, Jamie Foxx, Justin Bieber, Matthew Perry, Ray Liotta…
The phenomenon can’t be deemed rare when many in one’s 1st-degree network are touched: At least twenty-six of my friends and direct relations have been harmed. Here’s a picture of the brain aneurysm one of my oldest friends suffered this summer.
This is corroborated by the 3.5 million increase in working-age disabilities in the U.S. these past 3 years. Any attempt to portray COVID-19 vaccine accidents as rare is not only deceptive; it is, in my honest opinion, criminal.
Sadly, unveiling bolus-vaccine harm doesn’t end with mRNA.
How can there be more accidents? In your precise and cautious style, Bret, you suggested during the interview that these accidents are specific to mRNA technology, blaming novelty and cutting corners in the trials and suggesting that other vaccines are safer… Whether you wanted to keep the interview within the COVID frame for clarity purposes or because the public might not be ready to accept reality, it remains that all the data indicates that most vaccines have been harmful for a very long time, despite long trials… Steve has been raising the issue this past year, notably with the explosion of autism spectrum disorders these past thirty years.
This takeaway shouldn’t be missed; otherwise, a limited hangout strategy will scuttle the mRNA platform, proceed with the other technologies, and continue to harm our kids.
Eighteen months ago, I undertook a deep dive into vaccine injury case reports of the past 40 years (see the Table). Despite much camouflaging by the pharma industry, the table shows that the same injuries observed after COVID vaccines can also occur with other vaccines.
If vaccines with different technologies and distinct targets trigger the same outcomes, it can only mean one thing: same cause, same effect. Therefore, the bolus theory applies to other vaccines that are as dangerous as they, too, tinker with cells and trigger immune attacks in the same way, notably live attenuated viruses (MMR, chickenpox) and virus-like vaccines (Hepatitis B, HPV). In other words, vaccines tested in trials and authorized have been harming people for decades all because of a flawed injection protocol.
Why is the delivery protocol flawed? Is this certain? Most doctors are convinced a direct injection into the bloodstream is nearly impossible when injecting intramuscularly. This is likely due to a cognitive dissonance tied to the difficulty of intravenous injections in the arm. However, 5th-grade physics shows that if a needle ruptures a blood vessel close enough to the tip (within 1 cm), a portion of the dose will be delivered directly because of the sheer pressure differential. Even a fraction of the dose going IV can cause considerable harm.
Yes, it is certain. Not only do the applicable Laws of Physics guarantee a distant injection into a ruptured vessel, but confirmatory evidence abounds:
- many vaccine-injured experienced an immediate metal taste in the mouth23, a known sign of direct IV
- autopsies have shown concentrated immune attacks456 (foci), which are indicative that an IV-induced bolus occurred
- blood analyses7 have shown T-cells to be “exhausted”8 in the vaccine-injured, another sign of a bolus
- animal tests of IV injections have demonstrated the same adverse reactions, not only for the COVID vaccines910, but also with other past vaccines1112
- a poor 6-year-old was injected with the vaccine directly into his blood port and suffered terrible consequences. Steve knows about the story of Milo Edberg.
In other words, the Bolus Theory is reproducible.
The multiplication of vaccines now leaves almost no chance to escape the harm for those who follow the schedule.
Repeat a flawed protocol enough, and you are bound to be injured.
Repeat a flawed protocol billions of times, and you will necessarily damage the entire population.
It is hard to precisely estimate the damage’s extent at a population level. Still, a rapid simulation on an age pyramid of the US suggests 55 million people have been harmed clinically to date, and 190 million have been harmed sub-clinically. Not too far from the 61 million disabled, and in line with the scary statistics below.
If that’s true, why aren’t we witnessing the accidents? We are, we have. The accidents are visible. They explain the explosion of asthma, autism, auto-immune diseases, arteriosclerosis, cancers, endocrine disorders, gastrointestinal disorders, infertility, neurodegenerative diseases, obesity … and many more. One needs to dare the jump and make the connection.
Again, the Semmelweiss paradigm is at play.
It’s all visible, evident in the catastrophic decline of general health in the U.S. But we do not, or we don’t want, to perceive them as vaccine accidents because of:
- manipulations by public health authorities in accident labeling, a divide-and-conquer by taxonomy strategy
- the medical establishment’s fragmentation into various siloed domains and distinct conditions: neurological, endocrinal, gastro-intestinal, cardiac, obstetrical…
- the implementation by the pharmaceutical industry of countermeasures to control the narrative, notably blaming vaccines, bacteria, or genetics
(that was very visible in the media and the regulatory institutions during COVID), - the dilution of the pharmaco-vigilance data with less dangerous, more massive vaccines like the traditional protein flu vaccines,
- the schedule spread throughout the year and to specific age classes,
- the finger-pointing of the injured with a variety of false moral pretexts: careless parents with SIDS, parenthood in old age for Down syndrome, poor eating habits for arteriosclerosis…
- and, finally, our collective cognitive dissonance is that “This is just too scary to be true!”
Every time mass vaccination is undertaken, mass accidents occur.
Interestingly, every time mass vaccination campaigns are launched, mass accidents occur – even with non-mRNA technologies: for the swine-flu vaccination campaign in 1976, the Gulf War vaccination campaign in 1990 , the anthrax vaccination in the US military from 1998, the Dengue vaccination campaign in the Philippines in 2016, and now the COVID-19 vaccination, every time the signals of harm were very strong, signifying accidental intravascular accidents happen.
Effectively, we seem to have normalized vaccine harm and let down any sense of self-preservation. It’s time we changed that.
Many will challenge, and have challenged, the Bolus Theory given the quasi-insurmountable cognitive dissonance one needs to break.
Here are points that have consolidated the theory over time:
- Bodybuilders, who are experts at injecting steroids in IM, regularly suffer from a phenomenon called “Tren Cough”, which fits perfectly with the Bolus Theory. If it happens commonly with steroids, why would it not happen commonly with vaccines?
- Experienced nurses when injecting steroids, despite using the aspiration technique, have been shown to inject intravascularly at least 2.1% of the time.
- Bee stings are innocuous when in the tissue but are lethal – because of the magnifying glass effect – when in a vein.
- The Bolus Theory explains well why some are harmed and some aren’t for all types of vaccines.
Only the Bolus Theory can explain how differing vaccines can have the same adverse reactions.
Only a difference in delivery, bypassing evolution’s protection (the dilutive effect of the vascular system, the filters …) can explain this dichotomy. - The Bolus Theory explains logically for the first time many unexplainable conditions:
- why some cancers are aggressive (high ranking stem cell transfection) and others indolent (low ranking)
- why cancer cells have all the features of stem cells (p53 inhibition, midbodies, hTERT, self-renewal, lack of MHC…)
- why autistic children have so many other conditions (bolus rampage)
- why endocrine disorders are sometimes about hyper-secretion (micro-perforation), or hypo-secretion (necrosis)
- why obese have leaky guts (micro-perforation breaks up the pick-and-choose capacity of the gut-blood barrier and presents immune cells to the biome)
- what caused the insult to the endothelium in arteriosclerosis that led to calcification
- what’s behind aneurysms (wide endothelial damage in a high-pressure zone)
- why stroke patients are at risk of Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s (BBB micro-perforation)
- why infertility is on the rise
- how endometriosis works (sensitivity to estrogen/progesterone because of microperforation)
- what is behind neurodegenerative disease (bolus-induced BBB micro-perforation)
- The Bolus Theory states that when a bolus haphazardly passes through one’s body, it will more often hit in multiple locations, meaning that people with one specific bolus-induced illness should be more prone to have other illnesses caused by the hits in other places.
Indeed, all these illnesses have higher odds ratios than healthy people of having any adverse reactions. For example, those diagnosed with ASD (Autism Spectrum Disorder) often have had a stroke, have Parkinson’s, leaky gut, genetic disorders, chronic heart disease, hearing and visual disorders, any endocrine disorders, even cancer….I tested 40 bolus-deduced hypotheses, and all came out true. That’s 1 chance out of 1.1 trillion. It’s not a coincidence, Steve. I am sure you’ll agree. - If the cancer side of the theory remains conjectural, putting cancer theory upside down (B8/9), part A, “damage to the endothelium” is entirely verified and validated, consistent with Laws of Science (fluid dynamics, bolus pharmacodynamics, vaccine mode of action, etc…), and reproducible.
- Veterinarians have been using the aspiration technique with animal vaccination13, most likely because it shows when one vaccinates thousands of cows if too many are hurt. Animals are better treated than our kids…
- Dentists and anesthesiologists also use the aspiration technique to prevent many adverse reactions tied to an accidental IV.
I apologize for the lengthy technical memo.
I believe the Bolus Theory is a significant discovery that explains the explosion of many illnesses these past four decades.
Steve, as time passed, the Bolus Theory has never been falsified, stands way ahead of any other hypothesis, and even includes Kevin McKernan DNA integration (B12).
If properly publicized, the Bolus Theory could rapidly prevent more harm to our children and loved ones.
The Bolus Theory can help design effective, inexpensive therapies to cure billions of people worldwide, notably via oxygen therapy. It also opens the door, my Dear Steve, to a new era in health similar to the Amish reference.
This is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to change the world for the better and help billions; I hope you will accept to help me publicize it.
Feel free to reach out to me with any questions.
Yours truly,
Marc Girardot
More at:
More Stories
Sceptical Supreme Court Could Hand Trump Partial Victory In Immunity Case
Why is US threatening to ban TikTok and will other countries follow suit?
Biden’s new Title IX revisions are a repulsive attempt to erase biological truth