The left has unleashed a lot of damaging, weaponized tactics over the years, but one of the most troubling and dangerous is their takeover of the judicial system. And we likely have George Soros and his son Alex to thank for activating this wave of radical judges. Their blatant political activism is exposing just how corrupt and broken our judiciary has become.
So now the real question is: how do we fix it? How do we reform the judiciary and remove these politicized judges who think their job is to legislate from the bench?
There’s no magic fix—this is a very complex, multi-layered issue that will take real strategy and some serious effort. We’ve been covering the rise of activist judges for years, exposing how the left is using the courts to keep their agenda in place. It’s one of their favorite weapons, and sadly, it’s been working.
| Breaking News
Case in point: yet another Clinton-appointed activist judge is taking a swing at DOGE—the same radical who heartlessly sentenced a sickly, pro-life grandmother to prison.
Another radical activist judge using the courts to protect government corruption and punish regular Americans. This time, it’s Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, a Bill Clinton appointee who just blocked DOGE from exposing even more fraud in our bloated, unaccountable government.
And if her name rings a bell, it should—she’s the same lunatic who threw a pro-life grandmother, Paulette Harlow, in prison.
And if that wasn’t already bad enough, this activist judge then mocked Paulette’s husband and his Christian faith when he shared his very real fears that his elderly wife might not survive behind bars. She snidely told him she should “try to stay alive.”
That’s the kind of heartless sociopath the left puts on the bench. Gee, thanks, Bill…
You can read the full, in-depth piece below:
Activist judge who just blocked DOGE also threw a pro-life grandma in prison…
So, how can DOGE shut down this sinister interference from left-wing operatives disguised as judges? Well, one clever X user has a brilliant idea—and it’s something President Trump and Elon Musk should seriously consider. If they play this right, they could beat these radicals at their own game.
Take a look…
@DOGE, a single district judge has issued a ruling blocking the executive branch from access to Treasury data. There’s a simple fix: DOJ should demand injunction bonds. 1/
This will be a repeat problem for the Trump administration, just like it was in the first term, unless something is done to rein in frivolous injunctions. Activist judges could single-handedly gum up the entire Trump/DOGE agenda. 2/
Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(c), judges can issue injunctions “ONLY IF” the suing party posts a bond to cover potential damages if they’re wrong. But guess what? This rule is hardly used! 3/
When I was in the White House, in Trump’s first term, I suggested this, but DOJ didn’t make it happen. Imagine if we had applied this to the travel ban – activists would think twice before blocking policies with potentially billions at stake. 4/
The government has expert economists who can easily price out the cost of policies like birthright citizenship or wasteful spending. Price injunction bonds fairly, and frivolous lawsuits become a financial risk, not a free pass. 5/
Without injunction bonds, the American people bear all the costs of activists and judges blocking the agenda they voted for. Why should activists and judges get to overrule the American people with no penalty if they’re wrong? Our system wasn’t meant to work this way. 6/
For national injunctions, we’re talking bonds in the hundreds of millions or even billions. It will become prohibitive unless the activists have a slam dunk case. 7/
If a judge tries to lowball the bond amount, it’s a quick and easy reversal given the unambiguous language in the federal rules. 8/
The best part? This doesn’t block activists from court; it just stops them from using preliminary injunctions to pause government action based on arguments that might not hold up in an appellate court.
Dan will be keeping a close eye on this situation, so we encourage you to give him a follow by clicking here.
The left is terrified of losing their phony organizations like USAID, which they’ve been using as slush funds to keep their unpopular schemes afloat—things like fake news and radical LGBTQ and trans activism. Without taxpayers unknowingly footing the bill, these agendas wouldn’t survive.
Democrat Congressman Jamie Raskin is hilariously trying to fight DOGE—the very group working to cut bloat and wasteful spending for the American people. If they weren’t so infuriating, his words would be downright comical.
So now, they’re fighting tooth and nail to keep the gravy train running, desperately trying to rally Americans around these corrupt organizations. But thankfully, Americans see right through it.
Right now, taking down these activist judges is exactly what the American people want—they’re standing in the way of everything we voted for in November.
But as conservative JD Rucker reminds us—no need to panic, just plan. We’ve got this.
We won’t let these radical judges win.
Let’s hope President Trump and Elon (who we know read Revolver) see this article and Dan’s post, so they can come up with a plan to defeat these radical judges and keep pushing forward the will of the American people.
More at:
Here’s the Organization Chart That Exposes How Unelected Activist Judges Are Undermining the Role of Each Branch of Government
Activist judges across the nation have launched an all-out war against President Donald Trump’s constitutional authority, continuously blocking and interfering with his administration’s efforts to enhance national security and eliminate bureaucratic waste.
These unelected leftist judges—many appointed by Obama, Biden and other radical Democrats—have weaponized the judiciary, twisting the Constitution to fit their anti-Trump agenda.
Recently, over five federal judges issued temporary injunctions against President Trump’s executive orders, including measures to freeze government spending, dismiss ineffective civil servants, and restrict birthright citizenship.
These activist judges are imposing their personal political biases over the clear mandate given to the President by the electorate.
According to a detailed breakdown of the U.S. government’s structure under the Constitution, the executive branch, led by the President, is designed to enforce laws and manage the operations of federal agencies, including those within the Executive Office of the President, like the Office of Management and Budget, and the 15 executive departments, like the Department of Treasury and the Department of Education.
Vance responded to the ongoing travesties on Sunday with a perfect analogy. Drawing on both his military experience and legal background, he noted what would happen if a judge tried to sabotage a general or an attorney general from performing their legal duties.
“If a judge tried to tell a general how to conduct a military operation, that would be illegal,” Vance wrote. “If a judge tried to command the attorney general in how to use her discretion as a prosecutor, that’s also illegal.”
“Judges aren’t allowed to control the executive’s legitimate power,” he concluded.
President of Brownstone Institute, Jeffrey Tucker, shared an organizational chart outlining the functions of each branch of government.
“Here is the federal government org chart. Observe what the president controls vs. what the judiciary controls. These are executive agencies the actions of which only the president is held responsible,” he wrote.
He added, “I fear that POTUS needs to print this out and show it to the media so that they understand what’s going on. The president is held responsible for what these agencies do so therefore he needs control of them. Otherwise this chart and this system makes zero sense.”
The interference from the judiciary, particularly from these radical judges, undermines the clear separation of powers intended by the framers of the Constitution.
The President, elected by the people, should be allowed to fulfill his constitutional duties without the judiciary stepping beyond its bounds. It’s time for the American public to demand accountability from these activist judges who threaten the very fabric of our republic governance.
More at:
More Stories
Senator Chris Murphy Thinks Government Regulation of the Internet Would Prevent the Public From Electing Another Donald Trump (VIDEO)
Late Friday Trump Bombshell: US Makes Deal For ‘Permanent Control’ Over Greenland’s Security
‘Big Short’ Maven Michael Burry Argues AI Companies Are Hyping Panic To Cover For Slowing Growth In The Industry