The Senate will vote to confirm Kash Patel as the next FBI Director on Thursday afternoon at 1:45 pm ET.
Earlier Thursday the Senate broke the filibuster on Kash Patel’s nomination in a 51-47 vote.
The Deep State-media complex is attacking Kash Patel because of his stellar work exposing the Russiagate hoax in an effort to derail his nomination. Patel worked as former House Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes’ top deputy and busted the Russiagate story wide open.
A handful of Democrat Senators posted up in front of the FBI headquarters ahead of Kash Patel’s confirmation vote in protest.
RINO Senator Susan Collins announced Thursday morning that she is a “NO” vote on Kash Patel’s confirmation.
Democrat Senators used the last hour of debate before the final confirmation vote to trash Kash Patel.
The final vote to confirm Kash Patel began at 1:58 pm ET.
Update: RINO Senators Murkowski and Collins voted against Patel.
After breaking rank with several of Trump’s cabinet nominees, Senator Mitch McConnell voted to confirm Kash Patel.
The Senate confirmed Kash Patel as the next FBI Director in a 51-49 vote.
WATCH LIVE:
Senate Confirms Kash Patel as FBI Director, 51/49
J.D. Vance didn’t need to cast the tie-breaking vote — but it came close. Both Lisa Murkowski and Susan Collins voted against confirming Kash Patel as the new director of the FBI, but Mitch McConnell voted in favor, allowing Patel to take office by the narrowest Senate vote thus far for a Donald Trump nominee:
Every Senate Democrat voted against Patel. They were joined by two Republicans, Sens. Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, who said they believed Patel was too overtly political to lead the nation’s top law enforcement agency.
“Mr. Patel’s recent political profile undermines his ability to serve in the apolitical role of Director of the FBI,” Collins said ahead of the 51-49 vote.
Patel’s confirmation marks a tectonic shift at the bureau, as he plans to adjust its focus from terrorism and counterintelligence work back toward its historical mission of fighting violent crime. His priorities, partisan approach and open criticism of the agency he will lead set him apart from most every other director in the bureau’s history.
Given the political nature of the FBI over the past decade — and much of its first 50 years or so — one might think Patel to be a natural fit for the position. It certainly does send a signal that business as usual is over at the FBI, although what form that will take remains to be seen. Adam Schiff, who kept insisting that he’d personally seen evidence of Trump’s collusion with Russia and leaked false information while serving on the House Intelligence Committee, now fulminates in the Senate over [ahem] “trust”:
About a half-dozen Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee gathered outside FBI headquarters earlier Thursday in a last-ditch plea to derail his confirmation.
“This is someone we cannot trust,” said Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.). “This is someone who lacks the character to do this job, someone who lacks the integrity to do this job. We know that, our Republican colleagues know that.”
This is a clear case of projection. Schiff spent two terms in the House channeling Sen. Joe McCarthy and promising to prove that Trump was a Russian asset, while Devin Nunes and Patel exposed his lies and prevarications. For Schiff, this is all about revenge, not public trust.
Nonetheless, Patel does need to demonstrate that he can rise to the occasion and truly take the FBI in a non-partisan direction. He tried to back away from heated partisan rhetoric in the past, but firmly stuck to his plans to reform the bureau and bring it back to a strictly law-enforcement approach:
“I’ve overwhelmingly said multiple times that 98% of the FBI is courageous, apolitical warriors of justice. They just need better leadership,” Patel told senators during the hearing.
He touched only briefly on his desire to protect the country from national security threats, namely Chinese espionage, terrorism and Iranian aggression. But he repeatedly said his goal was to “let good cops be cops,” and spoke of sending more agents from Washington into the field to fight crime.
That partly depends on Congress, however. The FBI as a law-enforcement agency makes sense. Having the FBI do counterintelligence at the same time sounds good in theory, but in practice has been a disaster. The best approach would be to divorce those responsibilities from the FBI and to hand them off to another agency that’s less tempted to use the combination of both powers for political purposes. Unless and until Congress acts to do so, however, Patel is stuck with both missions and needs to demonstrate real integrity in keeping a nonpartisan balance.
Perhaps Patel can start working on a proposal for Congress to address this. That would be a very good step toward real reform and would help build confidence in his leadership. It’s his show now; let’s keep a close eye on how Patel performs.
More at:
JUST IN: Once-Trusted GOP Senator Embroiled In Major USAID-Related Scandal
Senator Tom Cotton (R-AR), once regarded as a staunch conservative voice in the Republican Party, is now facing major scrutiny over his connections to the International Republican Institute (IRI), a taxpayer-funded nonprofit that has received over $130.7 million in federal grants in 2024 alone.
According to DataRepublican, a leading investigative account on government spending on X, formerly Twitter, Cotton serves as a Director at IRI, though he does not receive compensation for his role. Despite this, the organization’s funding and activities have raised concerns among conservative circles, particularly in relation to its alignment with globalist initiatives that run counter to America First policies.
Recent audits reveal that IRI, one of eight core non-governmental organizations (NGOs) affiliated with the U.S. political establishment, has been heavily bankrolled by USAID, with nearly $130.7 million of taxpayer funds allocated to the organization in the past year. The financial records highlight significant spending on:
- Salaries: $38 million
- Fringe benefits: $17.5 million
- Travel expenses: $12.1 million
- Rent and utilities: $3 million
While IRI has long positioned itself as a pro-democracy group, it has also been linked to efforts supporting refugee resettlement through UN-affiliated organizations, such as the International Organization for Migration. Many conservatives believe that these initiatives undermine U.S. sovereignty and fail to align with Republican voters’ interests.
The news that Cotton is deeply connected to IRI has provoked a strong response, especially given his recent opposition to President Trump’s nominee, Elbridge Colby, for a key position in the Department of Defense.
Charlie Kirk, founder of Turning Point USA, called out Cotton’s role in what he described as an attempt to “undermine Trump’s agenda from within the Senate.”
“The effort to undermine President Trump continues in the U.S. Senate. @SenTomCotton is working behind the scenes to stop Trump’s pick, Elbridge Colby, from getting confirmed at DOD,” Kirk wrote. “Colby is one of the most important pieces to stop the Bush/Cheney cabal at DOD. Why is Tom Cotton doing this?”
Senator Tom Cotton (R-AR), once regarded as a staunch conservative voice in the Republican Party, is now facing major scrutiny over his connections to the International Republican Institute (IRI), a taxpayer-funded nonprofit that has received over $130.7 million in federal grants in 2024 alone.
According to DataRepublican, a leading investigative account on government spending on X, formerly Twitter, Cotton serves as a Director at IRI, though he does not receive compensation for his role. Despite this, the organization’s funding and activities have raised concerns among conservative circles, particularly in relation to its alignment with globalist initiatives that run counter to America First policies.
Recent audits reveal that IRI, one of eight core non-governmental organizations (NGOs) affiliated with the U.S. political establishment, has been heavily bankrolled by USAID, with nearly $130.7 million of taxpayer funds allocated to the organization in the past year. The financial records highlight significant spending on:
- Salaries: $38 million
- Fringe benefits: $17.5 million
- Travel expenses: $12.1 million
- Rent and utilities: $3 million
While IRI has long positioned itself as a pro-democracy group, it has also been linked to efforts supporting refugee resettlement through UN-affiliated organizations, such as the International Organization for Migration. Many conservatives believe that these initiatives undermine U.S. sovereignty and fail to align with Republican voters’ interests.
The news that Cotton is deeply connected to IRI has provoked a strong response, especially given his recent opposition to President Trump’s nominee, Elbridge Colby, for a key position in the Department of Defense.
Charlie Kirk, founder of Turning Point USA, called out Cotton’s role in what he described as an attempt to “undermine Trump’s agenda from within the Senate.”
“The effort to undermine President Trump continues in the U.S. Senate. @SenTomCotton is working behind the scenes to stop Trump’s pick, Elbridge Colby, from getting confirmed at DOD,” Kirk wrote. “Colby is one of the most important pieces to stop the Bush/Cheney cabal at DOD. Why is Tom Cotton doing this?”
This has fueled speculation that Cotton, once considered a Trump ally, may be shifting allegiances towards the Bush-era neoconservative establishment, which has long clashed with Trump’s America First movement.
Critics argue that IRI is one of several organizations that operate under the guise of promoting conservative values while actually furthering globalist and interventionist policies. DataRepublican pointed out that IRI’s spending patterns resemble those of many Beltway elites, prioritizing bureaucratic overhead and international initiatives over tangible benefits for American citizens.
More at:
More Stories
Stunning Sharyl Attkisson Report: Breitbart, Gateway Pundit, FOX, NY Post Being Shut Out on Yahoo, MSN and other Major Online News Platforms
Biden’s immigration failures went far beyond the border
House Dems’ Response to Ilhan Omar Warrant: Eliminate Homeland Security