“Dems demand infinity immigration, then infinity welfare — all at Americans’ expense.”
Democrat Mayor Michelle Wu of Boston, Massachusetts, is going viral for saying that every human on earth has the “legal right” to come to the U.S.A.
Wu’s comments have resurfaced and are once again gaining thousands of comments from outraged Americans.
In a video clip of an interview from March, Wu is seen saying, “Every single human being has the legal right to come to the United States and seek shelter.”
Of course, federal immigration law states that hopeful immigrants cannot just arrive on America’s shores, but must file for visas or asylum while still in their own country (or otherwise outside the U.S.), then go through applications and interviews before being allowed to come to the United States.
The far-left mayor’s comments have elicited a wide range of replies from congressmen, conservatives, and tens of thousands of regular Americans alike.
Texas Republican Rep. Brandon Gill, for one, ripped Democrats, saying, “Dems demand infinity immigration, then infinity welfare — all at Americans’ expense.”
Utah Republican Sen. Mike Lee also slammed Wu, writing, “Nope … That’s not how any of this works … Never has been… Never will be… Bad things happen when we pretend otherwise.”
In a second post, Lee wrote, “The quiet part out loud: The entire world has more right to America than Americans.”
Many others also chimed in:
Michelle Wu is the same Boston mayor who sponsored a “no-whites” Christmas party in city hall after she took office in 2023.
The notice for the party was sent to all city hall employees. Wu later delivered a strange apology and said the invite was only supposed to have been sent to “electeds of color” and not everyone.
As cities double down on migrants instead of city reforms, they lose more middle-class Americans, Michael Lind wrote in an article for Compact magazine in September of 2023.
“An international migration Ponzi scheme is the only thing that averts a demographic doom loop for [badly managed cities],” he wrote. “Only a steady morphine drip of low-wage international immigration and subsidies from taxpayers who live elsewhere keep these legacy cities from shrinking to more sustainable dimensions, like Pittsburgh, Buffalo, Cleveland, and St. Louis after World War II,” he wrote.
More at:
‘Stolen land’ Grammys rant explodes in Billie Eilish’s face as critics demand she hand over her luxury homes
Lefty pop star Billie Eilish is facing calls to hand over her ritzy Los Angeles digs to a Native American tribe or illegal immigrant after she declared “No one is illegal on stolen land” at the 68th Annual Grammy Awards ceremony.
The “Wildflower” singer, 24, is being accused of virtue signaling for the anti-ICE remarks she made while accepting the award for Song of the Year on Sunday night.
“What about if we all showed up to her mansion and said we are going to live there now? It’s stolen land right? She doesn’t own it,” wrote one X user in response to Eilish’s comments.
“Meanwhile, she’s chilling in her … Hollywood Hills fortress with armed guards and a moat of privilege. If the land’s so stolen, sis, hand over the keys to the nearest tribe or migrant family,” wrote political commentator and YouTuber Brandon Tatum.
“The woman is a blithering idiot. Of course, if she really means it, then she’ll happily hand over her multi-million pound Malibu beachfront home to illegal migrants,” wrote British journalist Julia Hartley-Brewer on X. “Which she won’t, because it’s all just silly celeb posturing.”
“Any white person who does a public ‘stolen land’ acknowledgement should immediately give his or her land to native Americans. Otherwise they don’t mean it,” charged US Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) on his personal X account.
Eilish, who Forbes estimated had a net worth of $53 million in 2020, purchased a $2.3 million horse ranch in Glendale when she was just 17 years old. That home previously belonged to British singer Leona Lewis, according to Hello! Magazine.
It’s unclear what other properties she owns.
Her brother and music partner Finneas O’Connell, who stood beside Eilish as she accepted her Grammy on Sunday night, reportedly sold his beach house on the sands of Malibu for $5.66 million in 2022, the LA Times reported.
More at:
Senate GOP Can Fix Elections, Boost Trump, And Wreck Dems With The SAVE Act
hat if I told you Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., has the power and the votes — right now — to save Republicans’ congressional majorities, President Trump’s second-term agenda, and maybe the republic itself, all while poleaxing Democrats on the short side of an 84-15 issue?
It sounds like fantasy. But like the Lady of the Lake from Arthurian legend, 2026 is offering up to the GOP a political weapon almost as powerful as Excalibur itself: an extended Democrat talking filibuster of national voter ID legislation.
Popular Idea, Toxic Opposition
Requiring voters to prove their citizenship is one of the most popular ideas in the country, with 84 percent of Americans supporting and only 15 percent opposed. That’s why 36 states and most of the world’s developed countries already have it on the books.
To most Americans, the only thing suspicious about voter ID is why anyone would oppose it. Surely no one wants noncitizens voting, right? Right?
Actually, Democrat leaders, donors, and activists very much want noncitizens voting. Elected Democrats are perfectly aware that the party machine registers ineligible voters and harvests their ballots as a matter of course. They also know that their woke base believes voter ID laws are pure evil, part of Donald Trump’s neo-fascist conspirazzzzzzzzzzz…
Conventional political wisdom, therefore, dismisses voter ID as a legislative nonstarter. Sure, Republicans could pass a bill like the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act through the House of Representatives, as they did last April. But Senate Democrats would filibuster it, denying the GOP the 60 votes they’d need to end debate and pass the bill.
But hold on a second.
Why would Republicans want to end an around-the-clock, nationally televised circus where Democrat senators defy 84 percent of the country — and about 70 percent of Democrats! — to defend illegal immigrant voter fraud in the middle of an election year?
Usually, party unity is a political asset. In the case of Democrat activists and elites’ opposition to voter ID, it’s a toxic asset, like the subprime mortgage derivatives that bankrupted Wall Street in 2008. Democrats can’t politically profit off their extremist ideological commitment against voter ID, but they also can’t unload it.
A Senate debate on the SAVE Act would fork Democrats between a country they can’t persuade and a base they can’t defy.
Historic Upside
For Senate Republicans, the strategy is all upside.
Today, they are staring down the barrel of a midterm election rout and two years of investigations and impeachments. On their current course, Democrats’ illegal voter registration programs will continue apace, and their violent, insurrectionist activists will declare victory in 2026 and start working on 2028.
Senate Republicans could reverse all those trends in a matter of days just by putting the House-passed voter ID bill on the Senate floor.
A Real Filibuster
Politicos who have only been Congress-watching this century have a funhouse-mirrors notion of the U.S. Senate’s legislative procedure.
In the post-Harry Reid Senate, majorities only bring bills to the floor once negotiators have secured 60 votes behind closed doors. Bills are called up Monday evening, and a cloture motion (to end debate) is immediately filed, starting a countdown clock that leads to a vote by Thursday.
This is not how the Senate is supposed to function. The old Senate process — with open-ended debate — is still the rules default setting. If Senate Republicans considered the SAVE Act under the traditional process, it would spring a trap from which Democrats might never recover.
Here’s how it would work. Leader Thune would call up the House-passed voter ID bill. At this point, the Senate would be “on” the SAVE Act. Senate rules would dictate that a vote on the bill — at a 51-vote simple majority threshold — must be the next thing the Senate does. The only way to delay that vote is for a senator to stand up and speak — indefinitely.
It’s harder to sustain than it sounds. To give an hours-long speech, a senator may not leave the floor, not even to use the restroom. He may not sit. He may not eat. If he so much as leans on his desk, he loses the floor, which either triggers the vote or requires another senator to begin speaking.
Democrat colleagues could piggyback on the filibuster and give long speeches of their own — but only two per senator. Once every filibustering senator’s speeches have been exhausted, the SAVE Act vote happens automatically.
Cloture — the 60 votes required to end debate the easy way — isn’t needed. Sheer physical exertion will carry the day.
There are tricks Democrats can play in this process. They can try to call up amendments, adjourn, or make other procedural maneuvers. Republicans can table those motions with 51 votes. This strategy isn’t quite free. It would require senators to work more than their preferred two-and-a-half days a week. Republican senators would have to stay on or near the floor for as long as Democrats are speaking. And Democrats could drag this out for as long as they can sustain the physical toll.
But however bored they might get on the floor, Senate Republicans would also be buoyed watching Democrats’ light their midterm campaign message on fire.
A Billion-Dollar Campaign Ad
Think about how a voter ID filibuster would play out, politically.
On Day 1, energetic Democrats would run to the floor, thump their chests, and join the fun.
By Day 2, media attention would sweep away all other political news. Left-wing journalists will breathlessly promote the Democrats’ cause.
By Day 3, the whole country will have been talking about voter ID — an 84 percent GOP issue — for 48 straight hours. Septuagenarian Democrats will still be on the floor showing off for a shrinking audience of blue-haired hysterics and late-night talk shows’ group therapy patients.
By Day 4, polling will show the country still supports voter ID. But Democrats’ base will demand they keep up the fight.
The hapless filibuster will be a 24/7 Democrat-produced GOP campaign ad that will continue until Democrats surrender.
This is how landmark legislation has always been passed. It’s a fiction that Senate majorities start with all the votes they need — that’s never the case. Rather, they must make the case, persuade their colleagues, and get the American people on their side. A talking filibuster is a way to check all three boxes, right now, rather than taking a single cloture vote, losing, and throwing up their hands in helplessness.
The only reason for Senate Republicans not to do this — not to save their majority, President Trump’s agenda, and the integrity of America’s elections — is that it would personally inconvenience them for a few days.
No one in America could possibly think that’s a good reason — not the voters and not President Trump.
More at:
More Stories
Election Integrity Concerns Mount in California As Excruciatingly Slow Vote Counting Continues
Random Standard Wi-Fi Routers Can Scan Your Body to Identify Exactly Who You Are, Alarming New Research Finds
Fox producer finds Memorial Day morons who don’t even know what holiday is for: ‘America’s birthday?’