FDA Commissioner Dr Marty Makary announced the agency will phase out the use of eight artificial food dyes in America’s food supply within the next two years.
The massive shakeup will free children from the ‘toxic soup’ that makes up much of America’s food supply, Dr Makary said.
Dr Makary, a trained surgeon, began his remarks by calling attention to an oft-cited review in The Lancet, which reported ties between artificial food dyes and hyperactivity in children.
‘So why are we taking a gamble,’ Makary said.
The Trump administartion will set a plan for food companies to follow in order to adequately phase out the use of Red 40, Yellow 5, Yellow 6, Blue 1, Blue 2, and Green 3 by the end of 2026 and start using natural alternatives, which the FDA will approve or deny first.
‘For companies that are currently using petroleum based red dye, try watermelon juice or beet juice,’ Makary said, lifting small bottles of juice off his podium. ‘For companies currently combining petroleum-based yellow chemical and red dyes together, try carrot juice.’
The latest proposal also revokes approval for two dyes, citrus red 2 and orange B, which are not as common as the other dyes included in Tuesday’s announcement.
RFK Jr suggested more additives could be next, telling the crowd: ‘We’re going to get rid of the dyes and we’re going to to get rid of every ingredient and additive in food that we can legally address.
‘And for those ingredients we can’t ban legally, we’re going to start informing Americans about what they’re eating.’
The plan also initiates a collaboration with the NIH to research how food dyes impact children’s health and development.
The new timeline follows a recent meeting where he urged food industry executives to eliminate artificial dyes from products before his term ends in 2028.
The FDA has not reached any formal aggreement with the food industry to carry out these goals, though they apparently have ‘an understanding,’ and the agency has not put forward a detailed plan for achieving them.
Dr Makary said: ‘This is not a silver bullet that will immediately make America’s children more healthy,’ but added that the Administration is ‘not interested in going down the same old path while watching America’s children get sicker.’
The FDA currently allows 36 food color additives, including eight synthetic dyes.
The FDA will push food manufacturers to eliminate Red 3 faster than the original 2027 deadline set by the Biden administration. (Pharmaceutical companies were given until 2028 to remove it from medications.)
The dyes Kennedy wants to remove are used widely in US foods. In Canada and in Europe — where artificial colors are required to carry warning labels — manufacturers use natural substitutes.
Some states, such as California and West Virginia, recently enacted laws that ban artificial colors and other additives from school meals, and in some cases, the broader food supply.
RFK said: ‘Four years from now we’re going to have most of these products off the market or you will know about them when you go to the grocery store.’
The FDA will fast-track approvals for ‘natural’ food dyes like calcium phosphate, galdieria extract blue, gardenia blue.
RFK said one of his top priorities would be to increase transparency in the food industry, which has not agreed to or weighed in on these terms yet.
He has long railed against Big Food and attributed the country’s ‘chronic disease epidemic’ to additives and ultra processed foods.
He said: ‘All of these industries have cast a dark shadow historically over this agency, and there are so many conflicts that we are now systematically eliminating.
‘That has allowed them to suppress the science. There’s shockingly few studies, even on food dyes.’
RFK pledged that labels on foods that contain artificial colors will be labeled clearly, and said some companies that do not comply may also risk carrying labels on their products telling consumers so.
Such a move would require Congressional approval—but given that major food manufacturers like PepsiCo, Kraft Heinz, Nestlé USA, and Tyson Foods are reliable Republican donors, it’s unclear whether lawmakers would risk jeopardizing those lucrative relationships.
“They need to get rid of the whole GRAS category. That stands for ‘generally recognized as safe’. Replace it with PS, ‘proven safe’.“
The announcements from RFK Jr and others elicited glee from concerned mothers and their kids sitting stage left. The ‘MAHA moms’ have become critical RFK Jr supporters.
Many, like food activist and blogger Vani Hari, believe they have been duped by major food manufacturers that have been stealthily adding risky ingredients to their food for decades.
Dr Makary said that if he had learned one thing during his career in medicine, ‘Always listen to the mom.’
Red 40 is one of several dyes containing benzidine, a human and animal carcinogen permitted in low, presumably safe levels in dyes.
The FDA calculated in 1985 that ingestion of free benzidine raises the cancer risk to just under the ‘concern’ threshold, or 1 cancer in 1 million people.
Consuming red 40 and other dyes regularly has been linked to hyperactivity in some children with and without ADHD. Studies have suggested that eating the dye can exacerbate symptoms or trigger behavioral changes.
Canadian researchers have also found Red 40, also known as Allura red, can hamper the gut’s ability to absorb nutrients, water, and electrolytes, increasing a person’s risk of developing an inflammatory bowel disease.
They say this wearing down of the body’s defenses could make people more susceptible to ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease.
Blue 1 is found in candies like gummy bears. Both of these ingredients have been associated with hyperactivity and inattention in children.
Several food dyes are banned or contain warning labels in Europe, where food and drug regulators have more oversight than the FDA.
Unlike European regulators, who proactively review ingredient lists and formulations before products reach store shelves, US regulators tend to take a more reactive approach.
It is unclear what happens next after Tuesday’s announcement or what kinds of enforcement mechanisms the government will take.
Dr Makary said: ‘There are a number of tools at our disposal.
‘I believe in love, let’s start in a friendly way and see if we can do this without any statutory or regulatory changes, but we are exploring every tool in the toolbox to make sure this gets done very quickly. And they want to do it — so why go down a complicated road with Congress?’
More at:
Supreme Court Ruling Makes Curious Exception For Illegal Migrants Ordered To Leave Country On A Saturday
The Supreme Court ruled that weekends and holidays cannot be counted when foreign nationals are given deadlines to leave the United States.
In a split 5-4 decision, a majority of justices on the nation’s highest court ruled in favor of Hugo Abisai Monsalvo Velazquez, a Mexican national who had been living unlawfully in the U.S. for years and ordered deported. Velazquez successfully argued that his 60-day notice to leave the country — which ended on a Saturday — should have provided more flexibility for weekends and holidays.
“Does every calendar day count?” Justice Neil Gorsuch, writing for the majority, wrote. “Or does the statute operate to extend a deadline that falls on a weekend or legal holiday to the next business day?”
“Here, as elsewhere, the term ‘days’ operates to extend a deadline that falls on a weekend or legal holiday to the next business day,” Gorsuch wrote.
Conservatives Gorsuch and Chief Justice John Roberts joined the court’s three liberals in the majority’s ruling. The other four conservative justices disagreed, arguing that they should have sent the case back to a lower court to decide whether federal courts even have jurisdiction over the matter.
In a dissenting opinion, Justices Samuel Alito and Brett Kavanaugh argued that the majority’s opinion essentially creates a two-day extension for those ordered to leave the country.
“Petitioner gives us no reason to believe — and I am aware of none — that the roads to Mexico, his home country, were closed; so he could have driven or taken a bus across the border,” Alito wrote. “He also could have flown to Mexico or any other country that would admit him.”
“Nevertheless, the Court holds that he was entitled to a 2-day extension because the last day of his voluntary departure deadline happened to fall on a weekend,” Alito continued. “There is no justification for that decision.”
Alito further argued that the ruling could prove to be a “windfall” for other illegal migrants subjected to self-deportation deadlines that end on a holiday or weekend, allowing them additional time compared to other migrants whose deadlines fall on regular business days.
Born in Mexico, Monsalvo Velazquez unlawfully entered the U.S and ultimately settled in the Denver area, according to court documents. When the federal government initiated deportation proceedings against him in 2011, he requested removal efforts be suspended and claimed he’d face persecution if returned to Mexico. Additionally, he asked to leave the U.S. voluntarily.
As noted in the Supreme Court’s decision, voluntary removal is incredibly beneficial for foreign nationals. Individuals determined to be removed are not able to leave of their own volition, but instead face detention and forced deportation. Voluntary removal, however, allows those the benefit of leaving at the time and place of their choosing, and avoids other “substantial” penalties that come with removal, such as being barred from entering the U.S.
In 2019, an immigration judge rejected Monsalvo Velazquez’s claim that he would face persecution if returned to Mexico, but he also found him eligible for voluntary departure, according to court documents. The judge gave him 60 days to leave the country — a deadline that ended on a Saturday. Because of this, the immigration judge stipulated that his deadline for voluntary departure would fall on the following Monday.
Monsalvo Velazquez responded to this order by appealing to the Board of Immigration Appeals, according to court documents, but the board in October 2021 rejected his appeal and established a new 60-day deadline for him to leave the U.S. On Dec. 10, 2021, a day before his deadline ended, Monsalvo Velazquez appealed this ruling.
However, the board did not accept the motion for filing until the following Monday and ultimately ruled against him, setting the stage for the Supreme Court fight.
The Supreme Court decision comes as the Trump administration has made immigration enforcement a top priority, and has heavily pushed illegal migrants to self-deport. The White House, which quickly ended an asylum app created by the previous administration, relaunched the app in March with a new feature that allows illegal migrants to declare their intention to self-deport.
More at:
More Stories
Trump’s Beijing trip is looking as successful as anyone could’ve hoped
A major watchdog says data centers are wreaking havoc on North America’s power grid
Next L.A. Mayoral Debate Canceled After Karen Bass, Nithya Raman Pull Out