Unrest has been reported across the country as workers have taken to the streets protesting unpaid wages and challenging unfair dismissals following the closures of factories squeezed by US tariffs
Protests from furious factory workers in China demanding back pay are spreading across the country after President Trump’s tariffs on Chinese imports began impacting the communist nation’s economy.
Unrest has been reported across the country as workers have taken to the streets protesting unpaid wages and challenging unfair dismissals following the closures of factories squeezed by US tariffs, according to Radio Free Asia.
Chinese industry leaders, meanwhile, are “extremely anxious” about the steep duties, with many telling factories and suppliers to halt or delay supplies, Wang Xin, head of an industry group representing more than 2,000 Chinese merchants told the Financial Times.
President Donald Trump takes a question from a reporter in the Oval Office at the White House on May 5, 2025 in Washington, DC. Getty Images
Protests by workers demanding back wages are spreading across China in a sign of growing discontent among millions suffering the brunt of factory closures, triggered by steep U.S. tariffs on Chinese imports amid an economic downturn. X / @YesterdayBigcat
At least 16 million jobs across many industries in China are at risk due to President Trump’s imposing of a 145% tariff on Chinese imports, according to analysis from Goldman Sachs.
“It’s not easy at the moment,” a 26-year-old toy factory worker told the FT. His employer, in the Chinese city of Zhejiang, mostly sells to the US, and management recently forced workers to take two weeks off unpaid in the face of the tariffs.
Last month, construction workers threatened to throw themselves off the buildings they were working on unless they received their unpaid wages in the northeastern city of Tongliao, Radio Free Asia reported.
Elsewhere, a sporting goods factory in southern Hunan province also shut without warning last month, offering no compensation or social security benefits, leading hundreds of workers to go on strike, the outlet said.
Protests in China have increased since the COVID pandemic as the country’s economy has struggled to bounce back, Beijing-based activist Ji Feng, who was one of the student leaders during the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests, told Radio Free Asia.
Chinese authorities have acknowledged that the tariffs are impacting the country’s economy.
In April, China’s factory activity showed its steepest contraction in 16 months, while new export orders dropped to their lowest levels in three years since the pandemic.Experts have grown fearful about President Trump’s aggressive tactics, however, the contraction in China’s industrial output and the protests show the president may still have leverage — despite Beijing raising its own duties on imports of US products to as high as 125%.
China’s President Xi Jinping has also traveled to his neighboring countries in Southeast Asia as he looks to forge closer ties with Vietnam, Cambodia and Malaysia in response.
Simarlarly, China’s Foreign Minister Wang Yi has reached out to his counterparts in the UK and the European Union.
President Trump has insisted things were going “fine with China”but it remains unclear whether any meeting between Trump and Xi will take place.
The president said he had no plans to speak to his Chinese counterpart this week during a conversation with reporters on board Air Force One on Sunday.
“But China and our people are talking about different things,” he added.
More at:
A Sane Solution to the Student Debt Crisis
Republicans should support student loan forgiveness…with some important caveats.
For the record, this is not a self-interested call to action. I have zero student loans and never did. Nor did I receive financial assistance from my parents; I do not come from a wealthy background. I paid for my private school college education using academic scholarships and cold hard cash that I earned from summer work. My argument here is political, not personal.
After three years of the COVID panic induced interest rate freeze, the 43 million Americans with student loans are set to begin paying on their loans in less than a month.
At a time of sky-high inflation and economic uncertainty, that additional financial burden will hit millions of households hard, as the average student loan borrower owes $37,000. It is no wonder that Joe Biden and the Democrats are eager to try and find a way to stave off this financial hit. The minute the economy stops limping along and plunges into full-on recession, there will be an enormous price to be paid by our political class. Resuming student loan payments could very well hasten that day of reckoning.
The conservative response to this situation has been to flip the bird to the student loan borrowers: “you took out loans, so you pay them back.”
That’s right, suck it up cupcake!
This response might be emotionally satisfying (“take that, you avocado toast-eating, Prius-driving, Joe Biden-voting, college-educated libtard!”) but it papers over key considerations. For one, student loan holders are a huge voting bloc, and a politically diverse one at that. Telling any group of voters to shove it, even if they have no intention of supporting you, is politically risky.
It’s also bizarre to see conservatives on the side of big banks and the federal government. Why is it always “you took out a loan, so pay it back” and never “you loaned out money to an 18-year-old who wants a gender studies degree; you’re an idiot”?
Mainstream conservative commentators like Ben Shapiro treat student loan debt as more sacred than marriage vows. This is an inversion. Paying back a bank is far less important than keeping your family intact.
Many have rightly pointed out that student loan forgiveness is unconstitutional, which is true. But it was unconstitutional for the federal government to loan out that money in the first place. There is no provision in our founding documents that says the feds are supposed to subsidize higher education for the whole population.
Indeed, it was the federal government pouring money into the university system that caused the price of college to skyrocket to such absurd levels. From 1963 until now, the price of a college education has tripled, after adjusting for inflation. Meanwhile, the inflation-adjusted starting salary for college graduates has remained flat at around $55,000 per year.
At the same time, mass immigration and outsourcing has hammered wages for non-college educated jobs. This economic situation has placed young people in a vise grip: either take on massive amounts of debt in order to have a shot at a middle-class life, or accept a place in the unstable and often grueling world of blue-collar work. Even today, a bachelor’s degree confers a 75% boost to lifetime earnings over a high school diploma.
Colleges have become the government-sponsored gatekeepers to economic wellbeing. The point of college in the modern degree-mill university system is to gain the social and political capital necessary to have access to high paying and high-status work. What is respectable today is liberalism. College is where young Americans acquire the social skills to navigate the politically correct world. In order to get a high paying job in finance, law, government, media, or the non-profit world, you need to know how to speak fluently about how much Black Lives Matter, “female penises,” and the pandemic of “disinformation.”
America doesn’t need re-education camps; we already have them in the form of our colleges.
The American Right, therefore, has an enormous incentive to shatter the stranglehold that a college degree holds on economic success. Student loan forgiveness offers a powerful tool on this front.
Republicans should support forgiving the vast bulk of the publicly held student loan debt in this country with the condition that the federal government stop giving out student loans altogether. Congress should forgive all of the current student loan debt AND pull all future higher education funding. That means no more Pell Grants, no more FAFSA, no more earmarks for colleges.
Right now, the federal government holds $1.65 trillion in student loan debt. Leaving the taxpayers holding the bag on these notes is fiscally painful, to be sure. But there are ways of meliorating that blow. For one, the total value of all college endowments in America is $800 billion. Along with student debt relief, Congress should pass a one-time 100% endowment tax that affects all colleges and universities that take federal aid (my alma mater, Hillsdale College, would be one of the very few institutions of higher education that would not be affected, because it takes zero dollars in federal aid).
This one-time tax would cut the taxpayer’s burden in half. Cutting all federal aid to higher ed would save another $150 billion per year. That means that in less than 6 years, the combination of the one-time endowment tax and the savings from future student aid would make the student loan forgiveness pay for itself. Instead of punishing non-college-educated Americans, my plan for student loans would punish the people responsible for putting so many students into debt: the colleges and universities themselves.
The upside of this tax and cut plan is that our institutions of higher learning would have to figure out how to survive without suckling on the taxpayer teat. A lot of schools would go bankrupt. Good. I say this as someone working on his PhD: the best thing that could happen to American higher education would be the complete elimination of all state money from the education system.
The influx of taxpayer cash has corrupted academia, turning the whole enterprise (with the exception of a few holdouts) into a repulsive grifting operation. Our country would be a better place if we razed every college in this country to the ground and started over.
Most people do not need college degrees. The best way to learn how to run a business, for instance, is not by getting a business degree but by working in a business. The same is true for most trades. The system of credentials and government licenses that dominate our lives are shackles on the creativity and productive power of the American people.
The massive debt burden on the college-educated gives corporate human resources departments a powerful tool to wield against politically incorrect employees. Without a high paying job, most college- educated Americans cannot afford to pay the mountain of debt that comes along with access to middle class life in modern America.
In medicine, the massive debt load that doctors must take on ensures compliance with the regime’s edicts. Much of the corruption in the medical field that we’ve witnessed over the last several years is traceable to the rigid political enforcement that flows from financial dependence.
A free market in education would make America’s colleges much healthier. In reality, the only type of person who needs college is the sort of young person who wants to read Plato in the original Greek, or who wants to dedicate years of their lives working through the more complex and pressing questions connected to human learning. The inducement to higher education should not be salary and compensation but spiritual fulfillment.
In turn, the quality of American high school education should become better. An army of unemployed PhDs from the implosion of American higher ed would mean that the worst scholars would have to get jobs more fitting for their natural talents…such as cleaning toilets, picking crops, and sweeping streets. Better teachers would find a place in America’s public schools, providing high quality education to high school students free of charge.
Forgiving student loans might not make college-educated voters support the Republican party, but it could very much weaken the motivation these voters have to go to the polls against the GOP.
More importantly, forgiving student loans now—with the right caveats attached—would severely weaken the liberal academic stronghold. Democrats don’t have an answer to this proposal. If they refuse to go along with debt forgiveness, then they lose face with their voters. If they allow future cuts to higher education, they weaken their ideological grip on the populace. Either way, the Left loses and the American people win.
More at:
More Stories
Senator Chris Murphy Thinks Government Regulation of the Internet Would Prevent the Public From Electing Another Donald Trump (VIDEO)
Late Friday Trump Bombshell: US Makes Deal For ‘Permanent Control’ Over Greenland’s Security
‘Big Short’ Maven Michael Burry Argues AI Companies Are Hyping Panic To Cover For Slowing Growth In The Industry